View a full range of our ebooks

View full library

Explore

Our Location

The PHA Group
117 Wardour Street,
Hammer House,
London,
W1F 0UN

0207 0251 350
info@thephagroup.com
PHA Digital Studio
Fourth Floor,
47 Dean St,
Soho,
London,
W1D 5BE

0207 0251 350
info@thephagroup.com
PHA Finance Department
117 Wardour Street,
Hammer House,
London,
W1F 0UN

0207 0251 350
info@thephagroup.com

Sport is for life, not just for summer

Sport is for life, not just for summer

Sport is for life, not just for summer - David cameron

It has been reported that participation in sport across the UK has fallen by 200,000 since October 2012.

15.3 million of us apparently play sport at least once a week but, according to Sport England, this is down from the 15.5 million who participated in sport some eight months ago. A 200,000 difference might not seem a significant enough figure for people to lose sleep over, but the main issue of concern is how the promise of a long-lasting Olympic legacy has generated no more than a small surge of interest, which has been quickly lost.

We’re quick to blame the weather for preventing us from completing menial everyday tasks: hanging the washing out, walking the dog, walking to the gym. But I’m not sure that the argument that this poor weather is one of the primary reasons for this recent drop in participation is a sound one.

Explaining away these figures by blaming the weather is not the correct attitude if we’re looking to successfully go on to address the problem. It’s also a slightly ironic argument, since the great British weather is not only out of our control but it’s a factor which has always been present. Nothing has changed. Should we be pleased with the fact that we still have relatively high participation figures despite the poor winter, or concerned by the indication that the government have missed their primary legacy target by 50%?

As the sun rose on the morning after the Olympic closing ceremony, children across the country were tying the laces of their new sports trainers and nagging their parents to take them to the local park, pool, or shooting range. Eight months later and it seems that was just a phase; a phase that lasted as long as the GB football team did at the Olympics.

But sport should be for life, not just for summer.

Between them, David Cameron and Seb Coe promised the country that the ‘Olympic Legacy’ would live on and that Britain would be defined by its value of sport at all levels. This recent drop in participation, however, leaves us wondering how exactly this proposed strategy of getting more children involved in sport has been implemented, and how it will continue to be implemented. To add to the problem, the government now faces the daunting task of trying to get participation levels back to where they were in October last year before they can even begin to increase them.

There are those who claim that sport is expensive to take part in. Take football for instance; pitches are not cheap to book and referees are expensive to hire. Many people simply do not have the disposable income to spend on playing sport. But you cannot expect the government to provide endless facilities, nor can people blame the government for their own lack of willpower to get out and exercise. Organised sport and physical activity are two very different things, and, while participation in organised sport can indeed be affected by financial factors, going for a run or having a kick about in the local park are free activities that should be part of everyone’s daily life.

I have never met anyone who has actually contributed to the surveys that provide these condemning stats, nor do I know how they are carried out, but surely the figure of a 200,000 drop must include those (not) taking part in everyday physical activity, and not just organised sport. This is where the responsibility of parents comes in to play. Every parent is accountable for the physical activity of their children up to a certain age, and they are also responsible for communicating to their children the importance of sport and maintaining a healthy lifestyle at the same time.

Having said all of this, 15.3 million people participating in sport across the UK is by no means a poor amount, and the total is up by 1.4 million since Britain won their bid to host the Olympics in 2005. Plus the gender gap has apparently been narrowed significantly, which can only be a good thing.

But it remains disappointing to see a decrease in participation since last year when apparently interest is high and facilities are thriving after a £150 million cash injection. There should be a positive correlation between interest, facilities and participation, but at the moment the latter is a problem – the cause of which is hard to put a finger on.

Wimbledon will inevitably bring a rejuvenation of tennis interest to the country over the next month, but only time will tell whether the effect of professional sport is enough to get Britain’s armchair fans outside and taking part themselves.

Sun, sand…..and seriously good sport

Summer Olympic Games

Since its introduction into the Summer Olympic Games in 1992, beach volleyball has undergone an astounding transformation, moving from what was once a niche, rarely touched upon sport, greeted with disinterest from even the most passionate of sports fans, into what has become one of the most talked about competitions of London 2012.

With mainstream crowd-pleasers, fronted by post girls and sweethearts of the nation, dominating the headlines and enjoying prime time viewing slots, the fact that beach volleyball (a sport completely out of place in a country lucky to enjoy a week’s sunshine out of 52) is able to claim any form of focused media attention, is both surprising and refreshing.

Refreshing that is, perhaps, until we look to the imagery that sits alongside coverage of the sport and the accompanying headlines bursting with innuendo and journalistic testosterone. Shots of Greece’s Maria Tsiartsiani’s backside and Zara Dampney’s washboard abs carpeted that UK’s daily newspapers during week one of the Games and leapt off the pages to provoke reactions of envy from female readers and jaw-dropping lust from male fans.

If there is one thing that the British sports media excels at, it is in understanding the unique selling point of a sport and using whatever it is that we, as readers, find all so compelling to captivate us further. In the case of beach volleyball, this appeal comes in the form of “semi-naked women….glistening like wet otters”, as Boris Johnson already so famously put it.

As The Telegraph’s Jonathan Liew reminded us, it was Dr Ruben Acosta, the man responsible for catapulting beach volleyball into the limelight when he took the reins at the FIVB in 1984, who had the political nous to identify the link between marketing potential and sex appeal.

“Beach volleyball has got a glamorous image, but that’s not something really to fight about. If it means that more people will come and watch the sport and go home with a different attitude to beach volleyball, then I think we’re kind of happy with it.” Dampney has hit the nail on the head. This is a sport which openly and unashamedly feeds off the British public’s interest in anything pleasing to the eye, but there is a method to this madness.

We would be naïve in thinking that the story of beach volleyball begins and ends with attractive bikini-clad females. The crowds of 15,000 that continued to flock to Horse Guards Parade last week demonstrated, in no uncertain terms, that today there exists an appetite for this sport, which extends far beyond the perception that was built some 20 years ago.

Today beach volleyball is a sport which enjoys a unique position as a female-focused, female-dominated discipline, a sport which has earned the respect of fans and the buy-in of media. We may have started out with a vested interest in the glamour that the sport promised but somewhere along the way we acknowledged the physicality and athleticism of the players, we got genuinely swept up in the drama of play and found ourselves absorbed in a theatre environment where big screens flicker, music blares and match time entertainment has us up on our feet doing the conga.

Every sport has a unique selling point, something which makes us as consumers buy into it and feel affected on a personal level at the outcome of a team’s performance or an athlete’s success. This compelling quality could be the presence of an iconic figurehead, as Sir Steve Redgrave continues to be for British rowing, or it could come in the form of memories of a standout moment in time, like Dame Kelly Holmes’ unforgettable success in 2004 in Athens, which bolstered interest in middle distance track events.

The greatest sports are those which locate that ‘special something’, use it to build the support of the public and, in doing so, create a more promising future for their discipline. For beach volleyball, audience buy-in may well derive from the promise of glamour but its appeal is solidified by the sheer physicality of its athletes and by each and every additional entertaining element that organisers have worked hard to introduce.

“Use sex to get the crowds in, use skill to keep them.” (Jonathan Liew, Daily Telegraph)……and what a smart move that was.